Skip to main content
Download PDF

The severity and risk factors for mortality in immunocompromised adult patients hospitalized with influenza-related pneumonia

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials volume 20, Article number: 55 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

To explore disease severity and risk factors for 30-day mortality of adult immunocompromised (IC) patients hospitalized with influenza-related pneumonia (Flu-p).

Method

A total of 122 IC and 1191 immunocompetent patients hospitalized with Flu-p from January 2012 to December 2018 were recruited retrospectively from five teaching hospitals in China.

Results

After controlling for confounders, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that immunosuppression was associated with increased risks for invasive ventilation [odds ratio: (OR) 2.475, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.511–4.053, p < 0.001], admittance to the intensive care unit (OR: 3.247, 95% CI 2.064–5.106, p < 0.001), and 30-day mortality (OR: 3.206, 95% CI 1.926–5.335, p < 0.001) in patients with Flu-p. Another multivariate logistic regression model revealed that baseline lymphocyte counts (OR: 0.993, 95% CI 0.990–0.996, p < 0.001), coinfection (OR: 5.450, 95% CI 1.638–18.167, p = 0.006), early neuraminidase inhibitor therapy (OR 0.401, 95% CI 0.127–0.878, p = 0.001), and systemic corticosteroid use at admission (OR: 6.414, 95% CI 1.348–30.512, p = 0.020) were independently related to 30-day mortality in IC patients with Flu-p. Based on analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), the optimal cutoff for lymphocyte counts was 0.6 × 109/L [area under the ROC (AUROC) = 0.824, 95% CI 0.744—0.887], sensitivity: 97.8%, specificity: 73.7%].

Conclusions

IC conditions are associated with more severe outcomes in patients with Flu-p. The predictors for mortality that we identified may be valuable for the management of Flu-p among IC patients.

Introduction

Influenza is a common viral respiratory disease that affects between 5 and 10% of the world’s population each year, resulting in roughly 3–5 million severe infections and 290,000–650,000 annual deaths [1, 2]. Influenza-related pneumonia (Flu-p) is a severe form of influenza infection associated with over 50% of influenza-related hospitalizations [3, 4].

In recent years, immunocompromised (IC) status has become increasingly recognized as frequent comorbidity of influenza [5]. Observational studies have shown that the influenza vaccine is less effective in IC populations [6, 7]. Together with decreased host defenses, IC individuals have increased susceptibility to influenza virus infection, and have a greater risk of severe outcomes [8, 9]. However, most previous researchers have only focused on patients with specific subtypes of IC conditions [e.g., stem cell transplantation, human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS)], which limits the generalizability of the conclusions [5, 8,9,10]. Data on patients with influenza-related pneumonia (Flu-p) is particularly scarce. Additionally, prognostic factors among IC patients with influenza remain largely unknown.

Here, we conducted a multicenter, real-world study that aimed to (i) assess disease severity and outcomes of IC adult patients hospitalized with community-onset Flu-p, and (ii) to explore the baseline predictors for mortality in these patients.

Methods

Patient recruitment

Patients who had been tested for the influenza virus at five tertiary hospitals in China between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2018 (Additional file 1: Material S1) were screened for eligibility. Patients with confirmed Flu-p were enrolled in this study. Patients were excluded if they: (i) were not classified as having community-onset pneumonia (i.e., were hospitalized within the last 28 days for immunocompetent patients and 90 days for immunosuppressed patients, with pneumonia onset ≥ 48 h after admission [11]), as the inclusion of non-community-onset pneumonia cases could have complicated result interpretation; and (ii) were < 14 years old.

Study definitions

Patients with Flu-p were defined as individuals for whom polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of respiratory specimens (including sputum, nasal/nasopharyngeal swabs, bronchial aspirates, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) were positive for influenza viral RNA, and for whom respiratory symptoms and chest radiographic findings were consistent with newly emergent chest infiltrates. IC patients included primary immune deficiency diseases, active malignancy, HIV infection with a CD4 T-lymphocyte count < 200 cells/mL or percentage < 14%, immunosuppressive therapy (Additional file 1: Material S2), solid organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, splenectomy [12]. Patients who had early neuraminidase inhibitor (NAI) therapy were those who had been administered NAI agents within two days of symptom onset [13]. Patients who had systemic corticosteroid treatment were those who had been administered one or more systemic corticosteroid doses at the day of admission. Patients with community-acquired co-infecting respiratory pathogens were those who had pathogens detected via standard microbiological techniques (Additional file 1: Material S3) within 48 h of admission [11].

Data collection

Data were extracted from patient medical records with standardized case report forms, and included demographic details, comorbidities (see Additional file 1: Material S2), baseline symptoms, vital signs, laboratory results, radiographic findings, community-acquired co-infecting respiratory pathogens, patient management, and outcome data [including NAI use, antibiotic use, systemic corticosteroid administration, noninvasive/invasive ventilation, admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU), complications during hospitalization and 30-day mortality]. Outcomes for those hospitalized for < 30 days were established through telephone follow-up.

Statistical analysis

A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess result normality, with normally and non-normally distributed variables presented as means ± standard deviation (\(\overline{x}\) ± SD) and medians, respectively. Continuous variables were evaluated with Mann–Whitney U tests or Student’s t-tests, whereas categorical variables were assessed with Fisher’s exact test or chi-squared tests. A two-tailed p < 0.05 indicated statistical significance. SPSS 22.0 or MedCalc 19.0 were used for all statistical tests.

To evaluate the effects of IC status on clinical outcomes, we performed multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression after adjusting for age, sex, duration from illness onset to hospital admission, influenza virus type, comorbidities, pregnancy, obesity, smoking history, receipt of early NAI therapy, systemic corticosteroid use and coinfection with other pathogens. Those risk factors had previously been associated with clinical outcomes in patients with influenza [14].

IC Flu-p patients were divided into surviving and deceased groups according to survival status at 30 days post-admission, and baseline characteristics were compared between the two groups. To explore the risk factors for 30-day mortality in IC, Flu-p patients, variables with p-values < 0.1 in univariate analyses were entered into the multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression analysis. The optimal cut-off and predictive value of lymphocyte counts were assessed using the area under the receiver characteristics curve (AUROC) based upon Youden’s index.

Results

Screening process

A total of 3405 hospitalized patients with RNA tests positive for influenza and 1313 eligible adult patients with Flu-p were included in the final analysis, including 1191 immunocompetent patients and 122 IC patients (Fig. 1). The three most common immunocompromising conditions were immunosuppressive therapy (57/122, 46.7%), active malignancy (25/122, 20.5%) and organ transplantation (17/122, 13.9%) (Additional file 1: Material S4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Screening algorithm of patients hospitalized with Flu-p. A total of 3405 hospitalized patients with RNA tests positive for influenza and 1313 eligible adult patients with Flu-p were included in the final analysis

Full size image

Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes between IC and non-IC patients with Flu-p

Compared with non-IC patients, IC patients were younger (median: 45.0 years vs. 61.0 years, p < 0.001), and were admitted to hospitals earlier after illness onset (median: 2.0 days vs. 4.0 days, p < 0.001). Chest pain (31.1% vs. 17.2%, p < 0.001) and pleural effusion (47.5% vs. 32.0%, p < 0.001) at admission were present significantly more often in IC patients, while fever (63.9% vs. 76.6%, p < 0.001) was present significantly less often. The median baseline lymphocyte counts were significantly lower in IC patients than in non-IC patients (0.6 × 109/L vs.1.0 × 109/L, p < 0.001). Other baseline vital signs, symptoms, and laboratory and radiologic findings were similar between patients in the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1 The clinical characteristics and outcomes of IC and non-IC patients with Flu-p
Full size table

Compared to non-IC patients, IC patients (43.4% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.037) were more commonly coinfected with other pathogens at admission. Incidence of gram-negative bacterium (69.8% vs. 48.4%, p = 0.003), fungus (11.3% vs. 0.5%, p < 0.001) and Cytomegalovirus (CMV) (3.8% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001) was higher in IC patients, while the proportion of gram-positive bacterium (37.7% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.017) was lower (Additional file 1: Material S5).

All of the Flu-p patients were administered antibiotics during their hospital stays. Compared to non-IC patients, less IC patients were administrated with systemic corticosteroids at admission (7.1% vs 26.2%, p < 0.001); more IC patients received noninvasive (48.8% vs. 25.7%, p < 0.001) and invasive (30.3% vs. 17.7%, p = 0.001) ventilation. Additionally, respiratory failure (41.0% vs. 22.9%, p < 0.001), heart failure (34.4% vs. 23.9%, p = 0.011), nosocomial pneumonia (17.2% vs. 7.4%, p < 0.001), septic shock (19.7% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) and nosocomial blood stream infections (7.4% vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in IC patients. The duration between admission to clinical stability (median: 14.0 days vs. 3.0 days, p < 0.001), as well as the length of hospital stays (median: 17.0 days vs. 10.0 days, p < 0.001) were significantly longer for IC patients than for non-IC patients. Finally, more IC patients were admitted to the ICU (48.4% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001), and the all-cause 30-day mortality rate (37.7% vs. 20.3%, p < 0.001) was higher in IC patients (Table 1).

Impact of immunocompromised status on clinical outcomes for Flu-p patients

After controlling for age, sex, duration between illness onset and admission, influenza virus type, comorbidities, pregnancy, obesity, smoking history, early NAI therapy, administration of systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics use, and coinfection with other community-acquired pathogens, IC status was associated with increased risks for invasive ventilation [odds ratio (OR): 2.475, 95% confidence interval (IC): 1.511–4.053, p < 0.001], ICU admission (O:R 3.247, 95% CI 2.064–5.106, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (OR: 3.206, 95% CI 1.926–5.335, p < 0.001) for patients with Flu-p (Table 2).

Table 2 The impact of immuncompromised status on the clinical outcomes of Flu-p patients
Full size table

Baseline predictors for 30-day mortality in IC patients with Flu-p

Results from univariate analysis revealed that respiratory rates ≥ 30 breaths/min at admission, and decreased baseline blood lymphocytes, blood albumin, PaO2/FiO2 and coinfection were associated with an increased risk for 30-day mortality in IC patients with Flu-p (Additional file 1: Material S6).

A multivariate backward stepwise logistic regression suggested that lymphocyte counts (OR: 0.993, 95% CI 0.990–0.996, p < 0.001), coinfection (OR: 5.450, 95% CI 1.638–18.167, p = 0.006), early NAI therapy (OR: 0.401, 95% CI 0.127–0.878, p = 0.001), and systemic corticosteroid use at admission (OR: 6.414, 95% CI 1.348–30.512, p = 0.020) were independent predictors for 30-day mortality in IC patients with Flu-p (Table 3).

Table 3 Risk factors for mortality in IC patients with Flu-p
Full size table

Association of coinfected pathogens with baseline lymphocytes and 30-day mortality in IC patients with Flu-p

The median baseline lymphocyte count levels for IC patients coinfected with gram-positive bacterium (0.9 × 109/L) was significantly higher than those for IC patients coinfected with gram-negative bacterium (0.5 × 109/L, p < 0.001), gram-negative bacterium/fungus or CMV (0.2 × 109/L, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A Comparison of lymphocyte counts of patients with different causative pathogens; B Kaplan–Meier curves showing the survival probabilities of patients with different causative pathogens. (**: p < 0.001). A The baseline lymphocyte count levels for IC patients coinfected with gram-positive bacterium was significantly higher than those for IC patients coinfected with gram-negative bacterium, gram-negative bacterium/fungus or CMV; B The survival rates of IC patients coinfected with gram-negative bacteriumand gram-negative bacterium/fungus or CMV were lower than those of IC patients coinfected with gram-positive bacterium during the first 30 days after admission

Full size image

During the first 30 days after admission, survival rates of IC patients coinfected with gram-negative bacteria (80.0% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001), gram-negative bacteria and fungus, or CMV (83.3% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001) were lower than those of IC patients coinfected with gram-positive bacterium (25.0%) (Fig. 2B).

Baseline lymphocytes as predictors for 30-day mortality in IC patients with Flu-p

The ROC determined that the optimal cutoff of baseline lymphocyte counts was 0.6 × 109/L, which reached an AUROC of 0.825 (95% CI 0.744–0.887), with sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 73.7% (Fig. 3A).

Fig. 3
figure 3

A ROCs for mortality prediction of lymphocytes among IC patients with Flu-p; B Kaplan–Meier curves showing the survival probabilities of patients with two levels of lymphocyte counts. A The ROC determined that the optimal cutoff of baseline lymphocyte counts was 0.6 × 109/L, which reached an AUROC of 0.825 (95% CI 0.744—0.887), with sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 73.7%; B The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the 30-day mortality of IC patients with baseline lymphocyte counts ≤ 0.6 × 109/L was higher than that of patients with lymphocyte counts > 0.6 × 109/L

Full size image

The Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the 30-day mortality of IC patients with baseline lymphocyte counts ≤ 0.6 × 109/L was higher than that of patients with lymphocyte counts > 0.6 × 109/L (69.2% vs. 1.8%, log-rank test, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3B).

Discussion

In this multicenter study, we found that IC status correlated with worse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with Flu-p. Additionally, we identified several early predictors of mortality for IC patients with Flu-p, which may help inform treatment regimens.

In our cohort, IC patients accounted for 9.3% of all Flu-p patients, which was consistent with previous reports of 5–15% IC incidence in severe influenza [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Compared to non-IC patients with Flu-p, we found that IC patients tended to be younger, presented with chest pain and pleural effusion more often, presented with fevers less frequently, and had lower level of blood lymphocytes. The other baseline clinical features were similar. Memoli and colleagues [15] reported that IC patients with influenza demonstrated fewer clinical symptoms and signs on clinical assessment. However, Collins et al. [16] showed that some symptoms and signs (e.g., fever, sore throat, myalgias, and headaches) were more common in IC patients with influenza. One possible explanation was for this difference is the discrepancy in evaluation timing. As influenza is a potentially progressive disease, some clinical features might be latent early in the disease course [17]. Another potential cause is that prior use of systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants might conceal symptoms in IC patients with influenza [18, 19].

Although similar baseline clinical characteristics were observed between the patients with and without immunocompromising conditions, disease severity in IC patients was greater than that in immunocompetent patients. IC adults were more likely to experience worse outcomes, including longer hospital stays, more complications, increased risks for intubation, and increased risk for ICU admission and death, all of which were in line with most previous reports [5,6,7,8,9,10, 15, 16]. However, we used a more broad definition of immunocompromised status, which means our results have more general significance.

We also identified risk factors that were predictors for death in IC patients with Flu-p, many of which have also been related to outcomes among immunocompetent influenza patients in previous research. Severe influenza is characterized by lymphocytopenia in 30–100% of cases [20, 21], although the mechanistic basis for this finding remains poorly understood. There is some evidence that CD4 + and CD8 + T cells may undergo higher rates of apoptotic death in individuals with severe disease, owing to higher circulating levels of soluble Fas ligand and caspase-1 [22], and thereby contributing to an overall decline in lymphocyte counts. Such virus-induced lymphocytopenia can delay viral clearance. Alternatively, these lymphocytes may be recruited to the respiratory tract and other organs, resulting in their apparent depletion from circulation [23]. Lymphocyte accumulation within the lungs can drive severe localized inflammation and tissue damage. Previous studies reported that the predictive value of baseline blood lymphocyte counts was 0.8 × 109/L in immunocompetent patients with severe influenza [24, 25]. However, because individuals with compromised factors often have low lymphocyte counts before coming down with influenza [26, 27], it is reasonable to expect that the optimal cutoff could differ. Su-Mi Choi et al. reported that, in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients with influenza, profound lymphopenia (< 300 × 109/L) was a significant risk factor for death [28]. In HIV/ARDS individuals with A (H1N1) infection, patients with CD4 T-cell count < 200 × 109/L experienced worse outcomes [29]. Our study suggested that, in general, in IC patients with Flu-p, baseline lymphocyte counts of 0.6 × 109/L could be used as an independent prognostic factor.

Coinfection has previously been shown to be related to adverse outcomes in immunocompetent patients with severe influenza [30, 31], as well as in IC individuals, highlighting the importance of timely infection control. Further, we found the survival rates of IC patients coinfected with gram-negative bacteria or fungus/CMV were significantly lower than those coinfected with gram-positive pathogens. Additionally, IC patients coinfected with gram-negative bacteria often had lower baseline blood lymphocyte counts. Thus, lymphopenia might be associated with increased mortality among Flu-p patients in multiple ways.

Previous observational studies have suggested that inhibiting viral replication at an early stage can reduce virus-induced inflammation and tissue damage, and thereby decrease overall influenza-related mortality rates for immunocompetent patients [32]. Our results showed it was still associated with better outcomes in IC patients with Flu-p. Early inhibition of viral replication might be particularly crucial in IC patients with influenza, because prolonged viral shedding is associated with the emergence of drug-resistant viruses and more severe disease courses [33, 34]. Meanwhile, systemic corticosteroids use may cause increased death by extensive suppression of humoral and cellular immunity [35], even in patients with immunocompromised factors.

Our study design has some limitations. First, as it was retrospective in nature, it was susceptible to selection bias. For example, nucleic acid tests for influenza were conducted based upon the subjective judgment of attending physicians. Thus, it is possible that only patients with more severe disease manifestations may have undergone testing, rather than all potentially eligible patients. In addition, previous reports have suggested that empiric antibiotic therapy is important for pneumonia patients [36]. In our study, although only 34% of patients were coinfected with other pathogens, all patients were given antibiotics. Thus, we were unable to assess the impact of proper empiric antibiotic treatment on Flu-p patient outcomes. Second, the sample of IC patients was relatively small. Third, because of the retrospective study design, we were unable to retrieve and evaluate vaccination data or other missing information, potentially constraining the accuracy of our results.

Despite these limitations, however, our study showed that IC status has a consistent and wide-ranging negative impact on clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with Flu-p. The risk factors for mortality identified in our study may be helpful for clinicians who manage IC patients with Flu-p.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Flu:

Influenza

Flu-p:

Influenza-related pneumonia

IC:

Immunocompromised

ICU:

Intensive care unit

NAI:

Neuraminidase inhibitor

HIV/ARDS:

Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome

OR:

Odds ratio

95% CI:

95% Confidence interval

AUROC:

Under the receiver-operating characteristic curve

ICU:

Intensive care unit

References

  1. Webster RG, Govorkova EA. Continuing challenges in influenza. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1323:115–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Uyeki TM. Influenza. Ann Intern Med 2017, 167(5):ITC33-ITC48.

  3. Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM, Schmitz AM, Benoit SR, Louie J, Sugerman DE, Druckenmiller JK, Ritger KA, Chugh R, et al. Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April–June 2009. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(20):1935–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen L, Han X, Bai L, Zhang J. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in adult patients hospitalized with influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;19:787–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lapinsky SE. H1N1 novel influenza A in pregnant and immunocompromised patients. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(4 Suppl):e52-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Samson SI, Leventhal PS, Salamand C, Meng Y, Seet BT, Landolfi V, Greenberg D, Hollingsworth R. Immunogenicity of high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019;18(3):295–308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes K, Middleton DB, Nowalk MP, Balasubramani GK, Martin ET, Gaglani M, Talbot HK, Patel MM, Ferdinands JM, Zimmerman RK, et al. Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine for Preventing Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza Hospitalizations in Immunocompromised Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;58:e44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin JC, Nichol KL. Excess mortality due to pneumonia or influenza during influenza seasons among persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161(3):441–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nichols WG, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Influenza infections after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, mortality, and the effect of antiviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(9):1300–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mombelli M, Kampouri E, Manuel O. Influenza in solid organ transplant recipients: epidemiology, management, and outcomes. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020;18(2):103–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, Fakhran S, Balk R, Bramley AM, Reed C, Grijalva CG, Anderson EJ, Courtney DM, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(5):415–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramirez JA, Musher DM, Evans SE, Dela Cruz C, Crothers KA, Hage CA, Aliberti S, Anzueto A, Arancibia F, Arnold F, et al. Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised adults: a consensus statement regarding initial strategies. Chest. 2020;158(5):1896–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Katzen J, Kohn R, Houk JL, Ison MG. Early oseltamivir after hospital admission is associated with shortened hospitalization: a 5-year analysis of oseltamivir timing and clinical outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69(1):52–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Muthuri SG, Venkatesan S, Myles PR, Leonardi-Bee J, Lim WS, Al Mamun A, Anovadiya AP, Araujo WN, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Baez C, et al. Impact of neuraminidase inhibitors on influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-related pneumonia: an individual participant data meta-analysis. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2016;10(3):192–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Memoli MJ, Athota R, Reed S, Czajkowski L, Bristol T, Proudfoot K, Hagey R, Voell J, Fiorentino C, Ademposi A, et al. The natural history of influenza infection in the severely immunocompromised vs nonimmunocompromised hosts. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(2):214–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Collins JP, Campbell AP, Openo K, Farley MM, Cummings CN, Hill M, Schaffner W, Lindegren ML, Thomas A, Billing L, et al. Outcomes of Immunocompromised Adults Hospitalized With Laboratory-confirmed Influenza in the United States, 2011–2015. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(10):2121–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peteranderl C, Herold S, Schmoldt C. Human Influenza Virus Infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;37(4):487–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lai ST. Treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;24(9):583–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Davidson S. Treating influenza infection, from now and into the future. Front Immunol. 1946;2018:9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bellelli V, d’Ettorre G, Celani L, Borrazzo C, Ceccarelli G, Venditti M. Clinical significance of lymphocytopenia in patients hospitalized with pneumonia caused by influenza virus. Crit Care. 2019;23(1):330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, Hernandez M, Quinones-Falconi F, Bautista E, Ramirez-Venegas A, Rojas-Serrano J, Ormsby CE, Corrales A, et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):680–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Boonnak K, Vogel L, Feldmann F, Feldmann H, Legge KL, Subbarao K. Lymphopenia associated with highly virulent H5N1 virus infection due to plasmacytoid dendritic cell-mediated apoptosis of T cells. J Immunol. 2014;192(12):5906–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith PK, Wang SZ, Dowling KD, Forsyth KD. Leucocyte populations in respiratory syncytial virus-induced bronchiolitis. J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37(2):146–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi SJ, Li H, Liu M, Liu YM, Zhou F, Liu B, Qu JX, Cao B. Mortality prediction to hospitalized patients with influenza pneumonia: PO2 /FiO2 combined lymphocyte count is the answer. Clin Respir J. 2017;11(3):352–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo L, Wei D, Zhang X, Wu Y, Li Q, Zhou M, Qu J. Clinical Features predicting mortality risk in patients with viral pneumonia: the MuLBSTA score. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Titanji K, Ofotokun I, Weitzmann MN. Immature/transitional B-cell expansion is associated with bone loss in HIV-infected individuals with severe CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia. AIDS. 2020;34(10):1475–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zidar DA, Al-Kindi SG, Liu Y, Krieger NI, Perzynski AT, Osnard M, Nmai C, Anthony DD, Lederman MM, Freeman ML, et al. Association of Lymphopenia With Risk of Mortality Among Adults in the US General Population. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1916526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi SM, Boudreault AA, Xie H, Englund JA, Corey L, Boeckh M. Differences in clinical outcomes after 2009 influenza A/H1N1 and seasonal influenza among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Blood. 2011;117(19):5050–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lopez-Aldeguer J, Iribarren JA, Valencia E, Barquilla E, Knobel H, Santos J, Lozano F, Group GS. Outcomes in HIV-infected patients admitted due to pandemic influenza. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012;30(10):608–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chertow DS, Memoli MJ. Bacterial coinfection in influenza: a grand rounds review. JAMA. 2013;309(3):275–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cantan B, Luyt CE, Martin-Loeches I. Influenza infections and emergent viral infections in intensive care unit. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;40(4):488–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zou Q, Zheng S, Wang X, Liu S, Bao J, Yu F, Wu W, Wang X, Shen B, Zhou T, et al. Influenza A-associated severe pneumonia in hospitalized patients: risk factors and NAI treatments. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;92:208–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee N, Hurt AC. Neuraminidase inhibitor resistance in influenza: a clinical perspective. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018;31(6):520–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alonso M, Rodriguez-Sanchez B, Giannella M, Catalan P, Gayoso J, Lopez Bernaldo de Quiros JC, Bouza E, Garcia de Viedma D. Resistance and virulence mutations in patients with persistent infection by pandemic 2009 A/H1N1 influenza. J Clin Virol. 2011;50(2):114–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hui DS, Lee N, Chan PK, Beigel JH. The role of adjuvant immunomodulatory agents for treatment of severe influenza. Antiviral Res. 2018;150:202–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Liapikou A, Torres A. Current treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14(10):1319–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to MedEditing LLC for the expert linguistic services provided.

Funding

This study was funded by Beijing JST research (ZR-201921). The sponsor had no role in study design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanjing Lishui People’s Hospital, Lishui District, No. 86 Chongwen Road, Nanjing, China

    Liang Chen

  2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, 4Th Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China

    Liang Chen

  3. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China

    Xiudi Han

  4. Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    YanLi Li

  5. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Huimin Hospital, Beijing, China

    Chunxiao Zhang

  6. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The 2Nd People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Yunnan Province, China

    Xiqian Xing

Authors
  1. Liang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiudi Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. YanLi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chunxiao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiqian Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: LC, XdH. Acquisition of data: LC, XdH, YlL, CxZ, XqX. Statistical analysis of data: LC. Drafting of the manuscript: LC. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: XdH, XqX. All authors agree with the article submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study design was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (No.201911–15). Given the retrospective nature of the study, the Ethics Committee determined that an informed consent was not necessary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: 

Supplementary data of this article.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Han, X., Li, Y. et al. The severity and risk factors for mortality in immunocompromised adult patients hospitalized with influenza-related pneumonia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 20, 55 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12941-021-00462-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12941-021-00462-7

Keywords

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials

ISSN: 1476-0711

Contact us